Understanding the Criticism: A Psychological Deep Dive into Chicago Season 13, Episode 3

Debunking Fan Comments Through the Lens of Psychology

Introduction

The latest episode of "Chicago PD"—Season 13, Episode 3 “Canaryville”—has sparked a surge of criticism among fans and online commentators. As a psychologist, I believe it's essential to look beyond the surface-level reactions and dive deeper into the psychological factors that shape fan responses. In this blog post, we'll critically examine the nature of the criticism, analyze fan comments, and offer a reasoned debunking of the most common complaints. Additionally, we'll explore the possible reasons behind the show's creative choices and consider what these decisions could be offering us as a fandom—whether that's new perspectives, character growth, or opportunities for richer engagement with the story and its themes.

Let me start by sharing that I'm a proud fan of Chicago PD—and I say that wholeheartedly! While I may not run some of the bigger fan accounts you’ll find on Instagram (like jasonbeghequote, jasonbeghe.spain, or 1jayhalstead), I’m passionate about contributing to this amazing fandom. I run this site, which is my Living Tree Company business Instagram site, however, I post my blogs here on my Living Tree Company Blog site, which many are about Chicago PD. I do have another Instagram page dedicated entirely to Just Beghe. If you haven’t already, check out our Just Beghe Facebook page, where I co-admin with the wonderful Hales. I also highly recommend visiting Jason Beghe’s new personal site and Brian Luce’s fantastic page, which is full of behind-the-scenes videos and photos. Dive in, explore these spaces, and connect with fellow fans—you’ll be glad you did! Do not forget to tune into One Chicago Podcast also, with our very favorite host, Brian Luce, on your favorite platform, or YouTube.

Analyzing the Criticism: What Are Fans Saying?

As I scanned social media threads and fan forums, several distinct criticisms repeatedly surfaced regarding Episode 3 “Canaryville”.

• Many viewers are frustrated by the continued reliance on trauma in Burgess’s storyline, with some arguing that her ordeal feels repetitive and regressive—echoing a TV reviewer’s observation that the show is cycling the character through familiar emotional territory rather than allowing her to move forward.

• Another frequent complaint centers on Burgess pulling rank on Adam, which some fans interpret as an abrupt shift in their dynamic and question whether it fits with past character development.

• The depiction of the “family” theme in the episode felt weak and insufficiently developed, leaving viewers unclear about the message or emotional resonance the show intended to convey.

• While the episode does offer a resolution, some viewers felt that the overall story was confusing.

• Although not directly tied to this episode, the arc of Dante Torres has been described by some as tedious, suggesting that his character’s progression has stalled and lacks fresh direction.

• Numerous fans remarked that the episode felt uninspired, highlighting how the central plot—centered on a crime erupting in the protagonists’ own neighborhood—seemed to retread familiar ground, especially recalling previous arcs like the one involving Dante Torres in Episode 2 “Open Wounds”.

• Fans further voice disappointment with the episode’s premise, citing a lack of originality and predictability in the procedural plot—many felt they could anticipate every twist, diminishing suspense and engagement.

• Finally, there’s a sense of disconnectedness between episodes, with plotlines feeling fragmented and continuity suffering as a result.

  
  

While these reactions are passionate, it’s important to recognize that they often stem from immediate emotional responses. Psychological principles, such as cognitive dissonance and parasocial attachment, help explain why viewers react strongly when familiar characters are put through familiar traumas or when relationships abruptly shift. These criticisms reflect a desire for growth, innovation, and consistency—expectations that are deeply intertwined with fans’ investment in the show. By understanding the psychological underpinnings of these responses, we can better appreciate both the intensity and the validity of the conversation surrounding “Canaryville.”

Cast of Chicago PD Episode 3 "Canaryville" - Courtesy of NBC

The Psychology Behind Fan Reactions

Fans form deep emotional attachments to long-running shows like Chicago P.D. Psychologically, this is known as parasocial interaction—a one-sided relationship where viewers feel personally connected to fictional characters. In the case of Chicago P.D., the fan base isn’t just passionate; it’s fiercely loyal and dedicated, powering the show’s enduring success as a cornerstone of the “One Chicago” franchise. This epic following is drawn to the show's gritty police procedural format, rich character-driven storylines, and the thrilling continuity woven through years of narratives and crossover events.

When the series introduces change—whether through new story arcs or surprising character behaviors—it can trigger discomfort or even anger among fans, a reaction rooted in cognitive dissonance. This psychological phenomenon occurs when new developments challenge established beliefs and expectations, especially in a show where viewers are so deeply invested. Ultimately, the unwavering devotion of Chicago P.D. fans not only drives the show’s popularity but also amplifies every emotional twist, making each episode feel legendary.

Additionally, groupthink can intensify negative reactions. When influential voices in the fandom criticize an episode, others may join in, amplifying the negativity even if their own opinions are less severe. This social validation reinforces the belief that the episode is problematic, regardless of its actual merits.

A Balanced Response: Addressing Key Fan Criticisms

Let’s take a closer look at the major concerns raised by viewers and consider them through a rational lens:

Kim Burgess: Realism and Resilience in Trauma Portrayal

The depiction of trauma in Kim Burgess’s storyline on Chicago PD has sparked debate, with some arguing that repeated traumatic events make her story less realistic and relatable. However, from a psychologist’s perspective, this criticism misses how trauma truly shapes law enforcement professionals. Burgess’s experiences credibly explore resilience and the realities officers face.

Police officers regularly encounter traumatic situations—violent crimes, life-threatening events, and moral dilemmas—which can lead to cumulative psychological effects such as PTSD, shifts in worldview, and changes in personal relationships. Not every officer responds in the same way; some develop resilience and adapt, while others may struggle with ongoing emotional challenges. Through Burgess’s repeated exposure to trauma, Chicago PD provides a nuanced and authentic depiction of the psychological toll inherent to policing. Her coping mechanisms—whether healthy or maladaptive—mirror real strategies used by officers in the field, from vulnerability and anxiety to determination and recovery. This portrayal not only educates viewers about the demanding realities of police work but also fosters empathy, presenting a balanced perspective that acknowledges both heroism and vulnerability within law enforcement. By grounding Burgess’s journey in psychological truth, the show invites audiences to appreciate the complexity and humanity behind the badge.

Trauma in Burgess’s arc isn’t just a plot device—it drives her character development. Her journey from rookie to resilient cop is shaped by struggles with anxiety, trust, and self-doubt, mirroring authentic reactions to adversity. These challenges push her to reconsider her values and relationships, making her character more relatable and compelling. Trauma acts as a crucible for her growth, exposing strengths and vulnerabilities that invite empathy.

Writers revisit trauma in her story to highlight resilience, justice, and recovery. Given the high stakes and constant danger on Chicago PD, trauma inevitably recurs, allowing the show to explore long-term consequences, healing, and setbacks. Each episode builds upon the last, creating a layered, realistic portrait of how high-risk professionals cope with trauma over time. Burgess’s coping mechanisms—whether healthy or maladaptive—reflect real strategies used in the field. This portrayal educates viewers about police work’s demands and fosters empathy, presenting a balanced view that recognizes both heroism and vulnerability.

Burgess Pulling Rank on Adam: Authority, Trauma, and Evolving Dynamics

From a psychologist’s perspective, Burgess asserting authority over Adam is not an abrupt deviation, but rather a credible reflection of how trauma and professional growth can reshape relationship dynamics within high-stress environments like policing. As officers evolve in their roles and face repeated adversity, shifts in power and communication are natural—even necessary—for navigating changing responsibilities and emotional landscapes. Writers intentionally weave this tension into the script to mirror real-world workplace challenges, allowing characters to confront issues of trust, respect, and vulnerability. By exploring these nuanced shifts, the show deepens its portrayal of partnership, resilience, and the ongoing negotiation of identity, making the relationship more authentic and compelling.

Family Theme and Emotional Resonance: A Psychological Perspective

Contrary to claims that the “family” theme in the episode felt weak or underdeveloped, a closer look reveals that it is, in fact, a central and powerfully executed aspect of the narrative. Makayla’s presence serves as a consistent source of warmth and humanity, providing a gentle counterbalance to the show’s intense, high-stakes procedural elements. Her role is far more than a narrative backdrop; she channels authentic connection and personal growth, inviting viewers into the deeper emotional layers of the series.

The relationship between Kim and Adam is a clear demonstration of the theme’s development. Their visible love and concern for Makayla are not just surface-level; their careful deliberations about where to raise her highlight thoughtful, responsible parenthood and a profound commitment to her well-being. These moments give viewers insight into true familial love, characterized by introspection and protective instincts that resonate beyond the immediate plot.

Moreover, Makayla’s influence on Kim and Adam is transformative, allowing both characters to explore vulnerability, empathy, and resilience—qualities that extend beyond their roles as police officers. Through their journey as parents, they experience personal growth and domestic intimacy, reinforcing the significance of family bonds. This evolution is not only evident but also invites viewers to reflect on how relationships foster meaningful change.

Ultimately, the episode’s family theme is sufficiently developed and deeply woven into the emotional fabric of the story. Makayla’s warmth and the evolving journey of Kim and Adam as parents create a lasting impact, encouraging viewers to appreciate everyday moments of love and care. Chicago PD uses the family theme to highlight transformation and hope, proving that it is not only present but essential to the narrative’s emotional resonance.

Chicago PD Season 13, Episode 3: Trauma, Ambiguity, and Sasha King’s Narrative Voice

While some fans found the plot of Chicago PD Season 13, Episode 3 confusing, it’s important to consider that the writers may have intentionally crafted a more complex narrative to mirror the psychological realities experienced by law enforcement professionals. One of the episode’s most distinctive features is its narration by the deceased victim, Sasha King (portrayed by Lauren Alexandria Roth), a young neighbor of Burgess and Ruzek whose tragic death forms the heart of the mystery.

The story unfolds through Sasha’s own voice, delivered via pre-recorded voice memos and cassette tapes discovered after her death. This narrative device serves a dual purpose: it gives Sasha a presence in the episode beyond her absence, and it provides detectives—and viewers—with crucial insights into her final days. As Burgess and Ruzek listen to Sasha’s recordings, they piece together her emotional state, relationships, and the sequence of events leading to her murder. The fragmented, nonlinear clues echo the reality of police investigations, where information is often incomplete and must be painstakingly reconstructed.

From a psychological standpoint, Sasha’s narration amplifies the episode’s emotional intensity and realism. Hearing the victim’s own voice fosters a sense of intimacy and immediacy, inviting viewers to share in her confusion, fear, and vulnerability. It blurs the line between observer and participant, immersing the audience in the ambiguity and uncertainty that both Sasha and the investigators experience. This approach not only heightens empathy for Sasha but also mirrors the psychological disorientation that law enforcement professionals frequently encounter during high-stress, traumatic investigations.

By weaving confusion and ambiguity into the episode’s structure—both through the complexity of the plot and the use of Sasha’s voice—the writers authentically depict how trauma and moral uncertainty are integral to police work, where answers are rarely straightforward and motives often remain obscured.

Sasha’s recordings, with their incomplete narratives and emotional rawness, reflect the nonlinear, chaotic nature of coping with trauma, mirroring the doubts and dilemmas detectives face throughout their investigations. Ultimately, the choice to narrate the episode through Sasha’s perspective allows Chicago PD to deliver a more immersive and emotionally resonant experience, drawing fans and psychology enthusiasts alike into the trauma and uncertainty that define both the victim’s journey and the search for truth. By embracing complexity and ambiguity, the episode not only remains true to the realities of law enforcement, but also invites the audience to engage deeply with the psychological and emotional challenges at the heart of the story.

Ultimately, these criticisms reflect a passionate investment in the show. By recognizing both immediate emotional responses and the psychological principles behind them—such as cognitive dissonance, parasocial attachment, and groupthink—we can better understand why fans react so strongly. Embracing constructive feedback and acknowledging these perspectives can help the series evolve in ways that honor both its legacy and its audience’s expectations.

Hank Voight and Dante Torres Chicago PD - Episode 3 "Canaryville" Courtesy NBC

Torres’s Stalled Journey: A Realistic Portrayal of Trauma and Recovery in Law Enforcement

Viewed through a psychologist’s lens, the writers’ decision to depict Dante Torres as stalled or searching for direction is a masterstroke in authenticity. Rather than rushing his journey, they capture the real, often messy effects of trauma and psychological distress on personal and professional growth—especially in the high-pressure world of law enforcement. It is not uncommon for individuals grappling with intense crises of faith or mental health challenges to appear stuck, their progress slowed or even reversed. What some may perceive as a lack of development is actually a true-to-life portrayal of how trauma can derail one’s sense of purpose, motivation, and self-worth.

Torres’s visible struggles—his anxious demeanor, lingering fear, and self-doubt after all he has endured—are much more than dramatic flourishes. These reactions echo genuine psychological responses to cumulative and unresolved trauma, with his untidy appearance and relentless focus on work serving as familiar coping mechanisms to shield against emotional pain. By choosing not to propel Torres rapidly toward resolution, the show’s writers invite viewers into the uncomfortable reality of recovery: a slow, nonlinear process marked by uncertainty and discomfort. This approach highlights the profound impact trauma can have and the time it truly takes to heal, fostering empathy for those whose progress is interrupted by invisible wounds.

Episode 2’s title, “Open Wounds,” was a perfect choice for Dante Torres’s journey, because right now many of his wounds are invisible. While some scars manifest in his behavior and interactions, the deeper pain remains hidden beneath the surface—unseen by others but profoundly affecting his sense of self and ability to move forward. The episode’s name resonates on both literal and metaphorical levels, reminding viewers that not all suffering is visible and that healing requires patience, understanding, and compassion.

In grounding Torres’s story in psychological truth, the writers demonstrate a deep understanding of resilience and the silent battles so many endure, making his character arc both compelling and deeply human.

Chicago PD: Trauma, Complexity, and Neighborhood Roots

As a psychologist analyzing television narratives, I find the criticism that Chicago PD’s recent focus on crimes within the protagonists’ own neighborhoods is “uninspired” or “repetitive” misses a deeper, more meaningful intention behind the season’s direction. Rather than recycling old plots, the writers are thoughtfully delving into the environments that have shaped each character—exploring their roots, their daily realities, and the communities that serve as the backdrop for their personal and professional identities. This approach is not only fresh but essential for authentic character development and audience engagement.

Chicago is renowned for its mosaic of neighborhoods, each with its own culture, history, and unwritten codes. These neighborhoods operate much like small towns within the vast urban sprawl—places where everyone knows each other, histories run deep, and the sense of belonging is palpable. By centering stories in the characters’ own communities, the show taps into the rich tapestry of Chicago’s real-life diversity, offering viewers a more nuanced understanding of both the city and its people. This is not mere backdrop; it’s a living, breathing context that shapes the characters’ values, relationships, and decisions.

This season’s explicit theme, “Roots,” signals a deliberate shift toward exploring where the characters come from—both geographically and psychologically. The writers are inviting us to see the world through the eyes of officers whose sense of self is deeply intertwined with their neighborhoods. By highlighting their homes, local hangouts, and community dynamics, the narrative grants viewers access to formative experiences and unresolved histories that might otherwise remain hidden. This exploration is a narrative strength, not a weakness, as it grounds each character’s actions in lived experience rather than generic crime tropes.

From a psychological standpoint, our roots—where we grow up, who we surround ourselves with, and the communities we call home—are foundational to our identity and worldview. When television delves into these aspects, it provides a richer, more layered understanding of its characters. By situating crimes and dilemmas within the protagonists’ own neighborhoods, Chicago PD allows for authentic emotional stakes and genuine vulnerability. We see how personal histories, loyalties, and traumas influence decision-making, coping mechanisms, and even moral ambiguity. Such storytelling offers viewers not just entertainment, but an invitation to empathize with the characters on a fundamental human level.

Far from being repetitive, this focus on characters’ neighborhoods is a bold narrative choice that revitalizes the series. Each episode becomes an opportunity to peel back another layer, revealing how the officers’ roots both empower and complicate their roles in law enforcement. The familiarity of their surroundings fosters deeper connections with secondary characters and recurring community members, making each case feel personal and resonant. As the season unfolds, the audience gains a more holistic understanding of what motivates, haunts, and redeems each protagonist—transforming familiar territory into fertile ground for growth and self-discovery.

By emphasizing the theme of “Roots” and focusing on the neighborhoods that shaped the main characters, Chicago PD is undertaking a rare and rewarding narrative journey. This direction doesn’t just build suspense or solve crimes—it enriches the storytelling by grounding it in psychological authenticity and social reality. For viewers and critics alike, this season offers a chance to engage more deeply with the characters, fostering empathy and understanding that extend far beyond the precinct walls. In a landscape of formulaic police procedurals, Chicago PD’s commitment to exploring roots is a meaningful evolution, reminding us that where we come from matters as much as where we’re going.

Predictability and Fragmentation: Psychological Depth in Chicago PD

From a psychological perspective, the perceived predictability and lack of originality in Chicago PD’s procedural plotlines may actually serve a deliberate narrative purpose. Familiar structures and anticipated twists can create a sense of stability for viewers, mirroring the repetitive and often routine nature of real-life law enforcement work. This approach allows the audience to focus less on the mechanics of the plot and more on the emotional journeys and moral dilemmas faced by the characters. By embracing familiar tropes, the writers foster a deeper connection between the audience and the protagonists, encouraging viewers to empathize with the personal stakes and internal conflicts that drive each case.

Rather than detracting from suspense, predictability can heighten psychological engagement by shifting attention to character development and the nuances of interpersonal relationships. When viewers can predict certain outcomes, they are invited to pay closer attention to the subtleties of how officers react, cope, and adapt within their familiar environments. This narrative choice provides a platform to explore the complexity of trauma, loyalty, and identity—key themes that resonate with both the characters and the audience. As a result, the show’s emotional depth and authenticity are amplified, offering a richer viewing experience that goes beyond surface-level thrills.

Regarding the criticism of fragmented plotlines and disconnected episodes, this structural approach reflects the chaotic and nonlinear reality of police work and trauma recovery. In high-stress professions like law enforcement, cases are rarely resolved in tidy arcs, and continuity often suffers as officers juggle multiple responsibilities and unresolved personal issues. By presenting episodes with fragmented storylines, the writers immerse viewers in the psychological uncertainty and ambiguity that are intrinsic to both investigations and personal growth. This technique encourages the audience to grapple with the same doubts and dilemmas as the characters, fostering empathy and engagement through shared emotional disorientation.

Ultimately, the purposeful use of predictability and episodic fragmentation in Chicago PD adds psychological realism and authenticity to the series. These choices invite viewers to experience the world as the officers do—where answers are seldom clear, routines are comforting yet challenging, and continuity is a luxury rather than a guarantee. By prioritizing emotional truth over conventional suspense, the show offers a rare opportunity for audiences to connect with the psychological complexities of law enforcement, transforming familiar territory and fragmented narratives into fertile ground for empathy, growth, and self-discovery.

Why Criticism Isn’t Always Negative

It’s important to remember that criticism is a sign of engagement. Fans care deeply about the show, which is why they react so intensely. From a psychological perspective, this passion is healthy—it indicates investment and loyalty. However, it’s equally important to recognize the cognitive biases that can distort perception and lead to unfair judgments.

Conclusion: Embracing Change and Growth

Chicago Season 13, Episode 3 challenges viewers to reconsider their expectations and embrace the evolution of beloved characters and storylines. By understanding the psychological roots of fan criticism, we can appreciate the episode’s strengths and recognize that change, while uncomfortable, is a vital part of storytelling. Rather than dismissing the episode based on group consensus or emotional reaction, let’s approach it with curiosity, empathy, and an open mind.

In the end, television is a reflection of life—messy, unpredictable, and full of growth. And that’s something worth celebrating.